top of page

'Nitram' Review

Star_rating_0_of_5 (1).png
July 16, 2021
By:
Hunter Friesen
  • Instagram
  • Letterboxd
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Nitram premiered at the 2021 Cannes Film Festival. IFC Films will release the film at a later date.


The career of Australian director Justin Kurzel, still very much in an early phase, has been one filled with drastic ups and downs. Kurzel broke onto the scene in 2011 with his feature debut, The Snowtown Murders, which played as part of the Cannes Critics Week. That film’s success immediately gave him the confidence to helm a much more violent and haunted adaptation of Shakespeare's Macbeth, with Michael Fassbender and Marion Cotillard in the lead roles. He also was given the promotion of competing in the main competition of Cannes.


After that film’s critical success, Hollywood came knocking as he was offered, and accepted, to direct the big-screen adaptation of the popular video game franchise Assassin’s Creed, which allowed him to reteam with Fassbender and Cotillard. However, Kurzel wasn’t able to make the leap into studio filmmaking, as the film was a critical and commercial bomb. He tried to recompose himself a few years later by going back to his roots with the Australian true-crime-thriller The True History of the Kelly Gang. The relative success of that film didn’t prompt Kurzel to return to the big studios, instead, he has doubled down on his newfound career path with Nitram, which premiered in competition at the Cannes Film Festival.



The film tells the life story of Tasmanian native Martin Bryant, who eventually was responsible for the largest massacre by a single person in Australian history after he killed 36 people at Port Arthur in 1996. From the very start, Bryant was beset with mental problems that made him act aggressively towards others and hold little concern for human safety. After he was sentenced to life in prison (where he remains to this day), Bryant was diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome and deemed to have an IQ of 66, roughly the same as an eleven-year-old.


The title of the film (which is Martin spelled backward) comes from the nickname Bryant was given by childhood bullies, further hindering him from forming any human connections. American Caleb Landry Jones plays the titular character with brilliance, showcasing how far someone can go down the rabbit hole. Jones has made a small name for himself by playing supporting parts as sleazy weirdos in films such as Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri and Get Out. In his first major leading role, he has knocked it out of the park. He produces the fear one gets from a horror movie villain while still bringing enough authenticity to fit the film’s grounded tone. His win for Best Actor at Cannes was well deserved, and some Oscar buzz should be in order.


Also within the cast is frequent Kurzel collaborator Effie Davis, who plays Bryant’s much older companion Helen, who lives alone in a rundown mansion with fourteen dogs and several dozen cats. Bryant and Helen formed a connection based on their status as social outcasts, which Jones and Davis are able to explore. Their interactions together are awkward and fractured and never answer the question of exactly what kind of relationship they share.



Anthony LaPaglia and Judy Davis, both of whom are superb, portray Bryant’s parents, who have differing perspectives on how they should keep their son safe. LaPaglia prefers to give Bryant a bit of freedom in hopes that he will figure out the world for himself, while Davis feels that he is incapable of doing such a thing and must be kept on a short leash.


Making a biopic about a country’s worst human offender brings with it a lot of trap doors, such as vindicating the perpetrator or glorifying the harm that they caused. Thankfully, Kurzel avoids those errors as he approaches the film with a matter-of-fact style that only wants to illustrate how this event was allowed to happen. Abandoning the flashy style he is known for, Kurzel lets the actors and simple camerawork tell the story. I was reminded of Gus Van Sant’s Elephant while watching the film at its world premiere. There is not one singular grand answer as to why this happened and how it could have been stopped, simply because there isn’t a one-size-fits-all response. All we can do is look back on what happened and see what can be done for the future, which Kurzel doesn’t seem to have much hope for as his postscript explains how the gun laws enacted as a result of Bryant’s actions have not been properly enforced, opening the possibility of this happening again.


Justin Kurzel’s Nitram was one of the best films of the Cannes Film Festival as it explores a real-life tragedy with both grace and severity. While my body hated the experience of watching the film because of the stiff muscles I was left with due to the intensity, my mind was left with a better understanding of this dark chapter in human history.

'All You Need Is Blood' Review

The result will leave you standing in a blood rain, drenched and humorless

'Red One' Review

I don’t care, and neither should you.

'Gladiator II' Review

I was entertained… kind of.

'Small Things Like These' Review

It seems that Mielants trusted his audience in the wrong areas, and we had to pay the price for it.

'Juror #2" Review

The evidence is all here, and the jury should find this movie not guilty of the drawbacks that have been placed on it.
bottom of page